MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The use of LEDs for the stomatal response, light compensation points, and storage of spinach and kale

2024· article· en· W4399761515 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Anne-Sophie Rufyikiri, Philip Wiredu Addo, Bo-Sen Wu, Sarah MacPherson, Valérie Orsat, Mark Lefsrud

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B Biology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicLight effects on plants
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsSpinachLeafy vegetablesLight-emitting diodeHorticultureCompensation (psychology)BiologyEnvironmental scienceMaterials scienceOptoelectronicsEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The spectral composition of some light-emitting diodes (LEDs) reportedly results in higher crop yield, prevents wilting, and reduces thermal damage to plants. The use of LEDs for postharvest storage and shelf-life extension has been limited, but the potential of this technology will allow for greater applications in horticulture and the food industry. In this experiment, ‘Winterbor’ kale (Brassica oleracea) and ‘Melody’ spinach (Spinacia oleracea) plants were measured for the light compensation point and stomatal response under 14 different wavelengths of light ranging from 405 to 661 nm. Data collected from these measurements were used to select two different wavelengths of LEDs and determine the proper irradiance levels for an LED irradiance storage test on spinach and kale. Treatments comprising blue, red, and amber lights were effective at increasing the stomatal opening, while the green light resulted in reduced stomatal opening. For spinach, the light response curve showed that light compensation points at 500 nm and 560 nm were 65.3 and 64.7 μmol m−2 s−1, respectively. For kale, the light compensation points at 500 nm and 560 nm were 50.8 and 44.1 μmol m−2 s−1, respectively. For the storage test experiment at room temperature, kale and spinach were stored under four different treatments: dark treatment (control), standard white fluorescent light, 500 nm, and 560 nm LED wavelengths. For spinach, the moisture content was 70.1% at 560 nm and 53.7% for dark, moisture losses of 41.5% under the 560-nm treatment and 52.0% for the dark treatment. The fresh basis moisture content was 74.6% at 560 nm and 59.3% in the dark. Moisture loss under the 560 nm treatment was 39.6% while the dark treatment had a 54.0% moisture loss. A visual assessment scale was monitored, 560 nm resulted in the top visual quality for kale compared to the other treatments with the lowest visual quality under the dark treatment at day 4. For spinach, the visual quality for 560 nm treatment was statistically the standard white fluorescent light and 500 nm, with poor-quality product occurring by day 4 and the lowest-quality product occurring at day 5. The LED treatments improved the shelf life of spinach and kale, likely as a result of stomatal aperture closure, photosynthetic rate near the light compensation point and stability of the atmospheric moisture content. This study provides valuable information on the extension of the shelf life of leafy greens during storage. Reducing fresh produce waste in grocery stores will increase revenue, thereby benefiting the Canadian economy while providing social and environmental benefits that entail increased food security and reduced food waste.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.129
Threshold uncertainty score0.158

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2024
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B BiologySame topicLight effects on plantsFrench-language works237,207