Identification and genetic analysis of a pervasive ‘needle-eye’ sperm phenotype in <i>Drosophila</i> sterile hybrid males
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Interspecies hybrid sterility has been extensively studied, especially in the genus Drosophila . Hybrid sterility is more often found in the heterogametic (XY or ZW) sex, a trend called Haldane’s rule. Although this phenomenon is pervasive, identification of a common genetic mechanism remains elusive, with modest support found for a range of potential theories. Here, we identify a single precise morphological phenotype, which we call ‘needle-eye sperm’, that is associated with hybrid sterility in three separate species pairs that span the Drosophila genus. The nature of the phenotype indicates a common point of meiotic failure in sterile hybrid males. We used 10 generations of backcross selection paired with whole-genome pooled sequencing to genetically map the regions underlying the needle-eye (NE) sperm phenotype. Surprisingly, the sterility phenotype was present in ~50% of males even after 10 generations of backcrossing, and only a single region of the X chromosome was associated with sterility in one direction of backcross. Owing to the common phenotype among sterile male hybrids , and the strong effect of individual loci, further exploration of these findings may identify a universal mechanism for the evolution of hybrid sterility.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".