Different climate conditions drive variations in gross primary productivity and woody biomass accumulation in a temperate and a boreal conifer forest in Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
• Investigated climate, GPP and xylem biomass in boreal and temperate Canadian forests. • Found strong GPP-biomass growth link in both forest types. • Boreal: cold growing seasons led to GPP and biomass growth reduction. • Temperate: drought linked to GPP and biomass growth reduction. Understanding the complex relationships between climate, forest carbon (C) uptake and biomass growth has become a research priority, crucial for assessing the climate change impacts on forest C sequestration. Such associations are expected to vary across biomes, due to different climate constraints on tree physiology. However, our understanding of the seasonal dynamics of long-term C sequestration and how climate influences them in different forest biomes is still limited. We investigated a boreal Pinus banksiana forest (Old Jack Pine, OJP) and a temperate Pinus strobus plantation (Turkey Point, TP39) in Canada. We aimed to assess the link between C uptake and above-ground woody biomass growth, and the effects of climate inter-annual variability on them. We used daily records of climate and gross primary productivity (GPP, period 1999–2019 at OJP and 2003–2018 at TP39), and investigated xylem biomass proxies at cell (cell wall area) and tree-ring level (ring wall area) from 1970 to 2019 at OJP, and from 1970 to 2018 at TP39. In both forests, the direct link between C sink and C source was revealed by the common inter-annual variability of GPP and xylem biomass. GPP and xylem biomass were mostly influenced by spring and late summer temperature at OJP. However, at both sites, summer drought negatively influenced GPP, and biomass growth especially in recent decades. Analysis of dry and cold years evidenced short-term negative effects of low temperature on GPP and xylem biomass in OJP, and of drought in TP39. Long-term intra-annual analyses are crucial to assess the variable effects of climate on forest C cycle. Warm spring and autumn can benefit both GPP and biomass growth, but even in the boreal forest, summer drought has negative impacts. Increasing dry spells, especially in the temperate site, could reduce future forest capacity to uptake C and fix it in wood biomass.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".