Expected evolution of the binary system PTF J2238+743015.1
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Context. Binary systems harboring a low-mass CO WD and a He-rich donor are considered to be the possible progenitors of explosive events via He detonation, producing low-luminosity thermonuclear supernovae with a peculiar nucleosynthetic pattern. Recently, the binary system PTF J223857.11+743015.1 was proposed as a candidate for this kind of stars. Aims. We investigate the evolution of the PTF J223857.11+743015.1 system, which is composed of a 0.75 M⊙ CO WD and a 0.390 M⊙ subdwarf. We consider the rotation of the WD component. Methods. Using the FuNS code, we computed the evolution of the two stars simultaneously, taking into account the possible evolution of the orbital parameters, as determined by mass transfer between the components and by mass ejection from the system during episodes of Roche lobe overflow. We consider that the WD gains angular momentum due to accretion and we followed the evolution of the angular velocity profile as determined by angular momentum transport via convection and rotation-induced instabilities. Results. As the donor H-rich envelope is transferred, the WD experiences recurrent very strong H-flashes triggering Roche lobe overflow episodes during which the entirety of the accreted matter is lost from the system. Due to mixing of chemicals by rotation-induced instabilities during the accretion phase, H-flashes occur inside the original WD. Hence, pulse by pulse, the mass of the accretor is reduced down to 0.7453 M⊙. Afterwards, when He-rich matter is transferred, He detonation does not occur in the rotating WD, which undergoes six very strong He-flashes and subsequent mass-loss episodes. Also in this case, due to rotation-induced mixing of the accreted layers with the underlying core, the WD is eroded. Later, as the mass-transfer rate from the donor decreases, a massive He buffer is piled up onto the accretor, which ends its life as a cooling WD. Conclusions. The binary system PTF J2238+743015.1 and all other binary systems with components of similar masses and similar orbital parameters are not good candidates as thermonuclear explosion progenitors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".