MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399766091 · doi:10.32920/26052430

Evaluating the Performance of Chiller 1 in Daphne Cockwell Complex (DCC) Building

2024· preprint· en· W4399766091 on OpenAlexaff
Mohammad Kassem

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicArchitecture and Cultural Influences
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan UniversitySciencetech (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWater chillerChillerComputer scienceEngineeringPhysicsMechanical engineeringThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A significant amount of the energy consumed in large buildings is used to operate the chiller plant. This research investigated the performance of water-cooled chiller in a multipurpose building to pave the way for future chiller optimization research. The objective was to pinpoint key trends and relationships between the chiller operating conditions and energy performance. To reach this objective, the research was undertaken in three steps; 1) the existing chilled water system and its control was documented, 2) time series of operating data was collected and analyzed, 3) the chiller efficiency was calculated. The results showed that the chiller has reached its optimal performance at COP of 11.24 at the following set of conditions: PLR = 46%, cooling output between 801.27 and 814.69 kW, and chilled water supply temperature between 6.3-7.5°C. This research also highlighted energy-saving opportunities that can be implemented in the central cooling plant to enhance the performance of the chiller.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.982
Threshold uncertainty score0.036

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.175
GPT teacher head0.362
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicArchitecture and Cultural InfluencesFrench-language works237,207