Community-based transactive energy market concept for 5th generation district heating and cooling through distributed optimization
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Fifth-generation district heating and cooling (5GDHC) is an emerging concept that exploits heat sharing among prosumers through a low-temperature bidirectional loop. Coordinating the energy interactions in such a system is a complex problem, typically solved through centralized optimization. In addition to privacy issues for prosumers, centralized optimization can prove too hard to solve for large 5GDHC systems and cannot establish a profit distribution between prosumers. To overcome these drawbacks, this paper develops a community-based transactive energy market framework based on distributed optimization of 5GDHC. The optimization is based on the Jacobi-proximal alternating direction method of multipliers. The approach relies on iterative interactions between the network coordinator and the prosumers, the former adjusting the internal price of thermal energy and the latter adapting their heating and cooling demand. A series of test-case 5GDHC networks involving houses, commercial buildings, data centers and central boilers and chillers were numerically simulated to demonstrate how the proposed framework performs, under three electricity tariff structures (constant, time-of-use or pay for peak). Results show that, for the cases tested, the gap between the proposed approach and global optimization is below 5% and that electricity savings compared to a situation without 5GDHC could reach 40%. The proposed method allowed to dynamically adjust the internal price of thermal energy and the prosumers' demand while considering their thermal dissatisfaction. By facilitating 5GDHC operation, this work could help their practical implementation in the future. • 5th generation district heating and cooling (5GDHC) uses heat sharing among prosumers. • New distributed optimization of 5GDHC has below 5% difference with central optimizer. • The new market determines internal price of thermal energy and prosumers' demand. • 5GDHC generates savings of up to 40% under different electricity tariffs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".