MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399767187 · doi:10.54097/d970ez22

Application of MOFs-membrane in post-combustion carbon capture for electricity and thermal energy plants

2024· article· en· W4399767187 on OpenAlexaff
Kuangdi Zhu

Bibliographic record

VenueHighlights in Science Engineering and Technology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicMetal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGreenhouse gasCarbon fibersProcess engineeringCombustionElectricityEnvironmental scienceCarbon capture and storage (timeline)Global warmingThermal energyWaste managementCarbon-neutral fuelCarbon dioxideCoalMaterials scienceChemistryEngineeringSyngasClimate changeEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Greenhouse gas emission typically carbon dioxide which result to global warming is becoming a very acute issue to human society. In order to achieve a sustainable development and society, various approaches to reduce carbon emission have been investigated and applied to industry where the majority of carbon emission happens in recent decays. Carbon capture is one of the key ways to address the emission and widely applied to coal-fired power plants. However, typically carbon capture process requires high energy input during the absorption and desorption process with lead to a low net carbon captured rate and high cost of operation. Materials with low energy penalty and high carbon affinity is desired to address this problem. In this research, a more advanced material, metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), for carbon capture under post combustion condition is introduced and evaluated from single material and cooperating with mixed-matrix-membranes to achieve membrane separation. Furthermore, MOFs are usually lack of stability and CO2/H2O selectivity. CALF-20 as the solution to these problems will be introduced later.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.184
Threshold uncertainty score0.295

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHighlights in Science Engineering and TechnologySame topicMetal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207