Resistor-Thyristor Geoinduced Current Protection for Power Transformer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
It is demonstrated that geomagnetic storms (GMS) can threaten electric power systems both in the Arctic and the middle latitudes of Russia due to the multi-year trend of magnetic pole relocation from Canada toward the Russian Arctic. The authors outline the key drawbacks of the well-known resistive grounding systems for power transformer neutrals that provide geoinduced current (GIC) protection. These include the need for various auxiliary electrical equipment to protect the resistor from single-phase short-circuit currents and isolate the neutral from overvoltage. Some quantitative criteria are proposed for the grounding resistor impedance to limit the GIC to levels that are safe for the power transformer and do not cause its core saturation. Some requirements for the resistor-thyristor grounding system of the power transformer neutral were put forward considering the restrictions imposed by the regulatory documents for grounding devices. The authors developed a resistor-thyristor neutral grounding system that automatically switches to the resistive grounding mode when its core is saturated due to GIC and returns to the solid-grounded mode after the GMS ends. It is shown that, when active components are represented by photothyristors with internal direct overvoltage fault protection integrated into the silicon pattern and silicon power resistors, the resistor-thyristor grounding system can be implemented without auxiliary electrical equipment. The authors calculated the electrical effects on the power components of the resistor-thyristor grounding system taking into account the rated power and voltage of the power transformer and the degree of phase voltage asymmetry.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".