On the use of senders for asymmetric tuples of cliques in Ramsey theory
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A graph G is q-Ramsey for a q -tuple of graphs ( H 1 , … , H q ) if for every q -coloring of the edges of G there exists a monochromatic copy of H i in color i for some i ∈ [ q ] . Over the last few decades, researchers have investigated a number of questions related to this notion, aiming to understand the properties of graphs that are q -Ramsey for a fixed tuple. Among the tools developed while studying questions of this type are gadget graphs, called signal senders and determiners, which have proven invaluable for building Ramsey graphs with certain properties. However, until now these gadgets have been shown to exist and used mainly in the two-color setting or in the symmetric multicolor setting, and our knowledge about their existence for multicolor asymmetric tuples is extremely limited. In this paper, we construct such gadgets for any tuple of cliques. We then use these gadgets to generalize three classical theorems in this area to the asymmetric multicolor setting.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.010 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".