MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399774269 · doi:10.3390/fluids9060144

Toward Scale-Adaptive Subgrid-Scale Model in LES for Turbulent Flow Past a Sphere

2024· article· en· W4399774269 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueFluids · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTurbulenceScale (ratio)Scale modelFlow (mathematics)MeteorologyMechanicsStatistical physicsComputer sciencePhysicsGeologyAerospace engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study explores the dynamics of turbulent flow around a sphere at a Reynolds number of Re=103 using large-eddy simulation, focusing on the intricate connection between vortices and strain within the recirculation bubble of the wake. Employing a relatively new subgrid-scale modeling approach based on scale adaptivity, this research implements a functional relation to compute ksgs that encompasses both vortex-stretching and strain rate mechanisms essential for the energy cascade process. The effectiveness of this approach is analyzed in the wake of the sphere, particularly in the recirculation bubble, at the specified Reynolds number. It is also evaluated in comparison with two different subgrid-scale models through detailed analysis of the coherent structures within the recirculation bubble. These models—scale-adaptive, k-Equation, and dynamic k-Equation—are assessed for their ability to capture the complex flow dynamics near the wake. The findings indicate that while all models proficiently simulate key turbulent wake features such as vortex formation and kinetic energy distribution, they exhibit unique strengths and limitations in depicting specific flow characteristics. The scale-adaptive model shows a good ability to dynamically adjust to local flow conditions, thereby enhancing the representation of turbulent structures and eddy viscosity. Similarly, the dKE model exhibits advantages in energy dissipation and vortex dynamics due to its capability to adjust coefficients dynamically based on local conditions. The comparative analysis and statistical evaluation of vortex stretching and strain across models deepen the understanding of turbulence asymmetries and intensities, providing crucial insights for advancing aerodynamic design and analysis in various engineering fields and laying the groundwork for further sophisticated turbulence modeling explorations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.557
Threshold uncertainty score0.991

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it