MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399774898 · doi:10.5151/sigradi2023-169

Dynamic Bending of Thin Glass to Control Surface Roughness of Building Facades

2024· article· en· W4399774898 on OpenAlexaff
H. Mulder, Dominic Chinh Nguyen, A. L. Moroz, Ryan Mcadams

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Analysis of Composite Materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSurface roughnessBendingMaterials scienceSurface finishOptical glassSurface (topology)Structural engineeringComputer scienceComposite materialEngineeringGeometryMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper describes the development of a research prototype for a kinetic transparent facade panel. Previous research has indicated the potential for kinetic facades to modulate airflow around buildings. With the ascent of thin glass and its application as kinetic building component, this project sought to further explore that potential with a transparent design. The project was undertaken as a design and making process, where knowledge is created through the collaborative engagement with the prototype. In its final state, the prototype, which used polycarbonate as a placeholder for thin glass, was used to visually assess the qualities of the transparent panel in motion. The project has led to a working mechanical scheme that creates a visually dramatic effect through distorting reflections. Analysis has shown that airflow can be modulated using this scheme, with possible applications for natural ventilation of buildings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.107
Threshold uncertainty score0.428

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicStructural Analysis of Composite MaterialsFrench-language works237,207