Assessment of communication-related quality of life in individuals with Alzheimer’s disease
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Purpose Alzheimer’s Disease is a neurodegenerative condition that affects individuals’ cognition, attention, behavior and language skills. With disease progression, problems are also observed in individuals’ participation in social life. Our aim was to investigate communition-related quality of life in individuals with Alzheimer's Disease and their language abilities.Method In this study, data were collected from a total of 47 Alzheimer’s Disease patients between the ages of 55–85. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Aphasia Language Assessment (ADD), Aphasia Impact Questionnaire (AIQ-21) and Beck Depression tests were administered. The Alzheimer’s Disease Related Quality of Life (ADRQL) scale was administered to caregivers.Results and Conclusion As a result of the study, we found that there is a relationship between language and quality of life of individuals with Alzheimer’s Disease. The quality of life of individuals with Alzheimer’s Disease is affected in line with their language skills. In order to more thoroughly investigate this relationship, additional research should be conducted.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it