NNICE: a deep quantile neural network algorithm for expression deconvolution
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The composition of cell-type is a key indicator of health. Advancements in bulk gene expression data curation, single cell RNA-sequencing technologies, and computational deconvolution approaches offer a new perspective to learn about the composition of different cell types in a quick and affordable way. In this study, we developed a quantile regression and deep learning-based method called Neural Network Immune Contexture Estimator (NNICE) to estimate the cell type abundance and its uncertainty by automatically deconvolving bulk RNA-seq data. The proposed NNICE model was able to successfully recover ground-truth cell type fraction values given unseen bulk mixture gene expression profiles from the same dataset it was trained on. Compared with baseline methods, NNICE achieved better performance on deconvolve both pseudo-bulk gene expressions (Pearson correlation R = 0.9) and real bulk gene expression data (Pearson correlation R = 0.9) across all cell types. In conclusion, NNICE combines statistic inference with deep learning to provide accurate and interpretable cell type deconvolution from bulk gene expression.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".