Bibliographic record
Abstract
Discontinuum physics (DCP) provides the non-arbitrary requirement for excluding the antimatter solutions to Dirac’s equation, resulting in a matter‐antimatter asymmetry. A matter‐antimatter asymmetrical universe then results from coupling the matter‐antimatter asymmetry with (1) the prior DCP proposal that the universe came into existence from a quantum fluctuation of a type of vacuum state with a zero net total energy, (2) allowing this quantum fluctuation to constitute a discontinuity containing the non-arbitrary requirement, with this occurring similar to how DCP showed the atomic absorption and emission process (AE-process) of Bohr’s atomic model constitutes a discontinuity, and (3) allowing this discontinuity to be conserved when the universe comes into existence, with this occurring similar to how DCP showed the AE-process discontinuity of Bohr’s atomic model is conserved as the emitted electromagnetic radiation (i.e., photon) discontinuity, where (a) a photon spends a large amount of time in the nonzero state during which it can interact with another photon in a collision, becoming a matter‐antimatter pair, and (b) a photon spends a tiny amount of time in the zero state during which it cannot interact with any particles and allowing it to be capable of spontaneously become a matter particle.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".