MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399784576 · doi:10.25518/0037-9565.11904

Necessity of a TDI Optical Corrector for ILMT Observations

2024· article· en· W4399784576 on OpenAlexafffund
Vibhore Negi, Bhavya Ailawadhi, Talat Akhunov, E. F. Borra, Monalisa Dubey, Naveen Dukiya, Jiuyang Fu, Baldeep Grewal, Paul Hickson, Brajesh Kumar, Kuntal Misra, Kumar Pranshu, Ethen Sun, Jean Surdej

Bibliographic record

VenueBulletin de la Société Royale des Sciences de Liège · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCalibration and Measurement Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversité Laval
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaService Public de WallonieUniversité de LiègeBelgian Federal Science Policy OfficeFonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRSDepartment of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, IndiaYork University
KeywordsPredictor–corrector methodComputer scienceMathematicsApplied mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The International Liquid Mirror Telescope (ILMT) has recently become operational at the Devasthal Observatory of ARIES, Nainital, India. The ILMT observes in the Time delay integration (TDI) mode where the images are formed by electronically stepping the charges over the pixels of the CCD, along a column. Observations near the zenith impose certain constraints dependent on the latitude such as image deformation due to the star-trail curvature and differential speed. These effects make the stellar trajectories in the focal plane of the ILMT to be hyperbolic, which are corrected for by the introduction of a TDI optical corrector, designed specifically for the ILMT. Here, we report the first results on the effect of this corrector on the trajectories followed by the stars in the ILMT focal plane. Astrometrically calibrating nine nights of data recorded with the ILMT during its first commissioning phase, we find simple (nearly linear) relations between the CCD-y coordinate and the right ascension (RA) of stars and between the CCD-x coordinate and their declination (DEC), respectively, which confirms that the TDI corrector works very fine in converting the stellar trajectories into straight lines.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBulletin de la Société Royale des Sciences de LiègeSame topicCalibration and Measurement TechniquesFrench-language works237,207