Magnetic field platform for experiments on well-mixed and spatially structured microbial populations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Magnetic fields have been shown to affect sensing, migration, and navigation in living organisms. However, the effects of magnetic fields on microorganisms largely remain to be elucidated. We develop an open-source, 3D-printed magnetic field exposure device to perform experiments on well-mixed and spatially structured microbial populations. This device is designed in AutoCAD, modeled in COMSOL, and validated using a Gaussmeter and experiments on the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We find that static magnetic field exposure slows the spatially structured expansion of yeast mats that expand in two dimensions, but not yeast mats that expand in three dimensions, across the surface of semi-solid yeast extract-peptone-dextrose agar media. We also find that magnetic fields do not affect the growth of planktonic yeast cells in well-mixed liquid yeast extract-peptone-dextrose media. This study provides an adaptable device for performing controlled magnetic field experiments on microbes and advances our understanding of the effects of magnetic fields on fungi.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".