Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este artigo parte da observação de memes de cunho machista que circularam nas redes sociais, em especial no WhatsApp, tendo por pretexto os constrangimentos impostos pela quarentena decretada durante a pandemia provocada pelo vírus Covid 19. Esses reproduziram representações e violências de gênero em forma de “humor”. Analisamos, em perspectiva de gênero, as ideias veiculadas nas mensagens selecionadas, os assim chamados memes, perguntando-nos se há e qual seria a sua relação com religião. Verificou--se que a articulação entre neoliberalismo, conservadorismo político e religioso observado nos últimos anos no contexto brasileiro, concorreu para a reprodução e reforço de ideias de caráter misógino, sexista e racista/xenófobo, a fim de garantir a “imunidade” da família tradicional e a manutenção da divisão sexual do trabalho. Conclui-se que, ao disseminar tais paradigmas, o conteúdo dos memes selecionados reproduz as violências de gênero que perpassam a construção da família preconizada por grupos religiosos conservadores.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".