MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399806168 · doi:10.32920/26064085

Automatic Continuities of Law-Invariant Risk Measures

2024· preprint· en· W4399806168 on OpenAlexaff
Shengzhong Chen

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicCredit Risk and Financial Regulations
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInvariant (physics)Political scienceLawMathematicsMathematical physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this thesis, we investigate the automatic continuity properties of law-invariant risk measures on general model spaces. In Chapter 2, we study automatic order lower semi-continuity of law-invariant risk measures, which is usually termed as the Fatou property in the literature. Let X be a rearrangement-invariant space other than L∞ over a non-atomic probability space. We show that every real-valued, law-invariant, coherent risk measure automatically has the Fatou property at every random variable X ∈ X whose negative tails have vanishing norm (i.e., limn∥X1{X≤−n}∥ = 0) if and only if X satisfies the Almost Order Continuous Equidistributional Average (AOCEA) property, namely, d(CL(X), Xa) = 0 for any nonnegative random variable X ∈ X , where CL(X) is the convex hull of all random variables having the same distribution as X and Xa = { X ∈ X : limn∥X1|X|≥n∥ = 0 } . We also show that the AOCEA property is satisfied by most classical model spaces, including Orlicz spaces. In Chapter 3, we first show that on an r.i. space with the AOCEA property, every real-valued, law-invariant, coherent risk measure is automatically σ(X , X ′ )-lower semicontinuity at every random variable X ∈ X whose negative tails have vanishing norm. Here X ′ is the associated space of X . We also recover a local version of the Fenchel-Moreau Duality and apply it to establish automatic dual representations of risk measures. Finally, in Chapter 4, we apply our results to study when law-invariant bounded linear functionals automatically collapse to the mean, i.e., being scalar multiples of the expectation. We show that on every r.i. space with the AOCEA property, a bounded law-invariant linear functional collapses to the mean. We also construct an r.i. space on which a bounded law-invariant linear functional may fail to collapse to the mean and thus the space fails the AOCEA property. The thesis is based on [10, 11].

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0030.005
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCredit Risk and Financial RegulationsFrench-language works237,207