An update on central nervous system tumors in germline replication-repair deficiency syndromes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
DNA replication-repair deficiency (RRD) arises from pathogenic variants in the mismatch repair and/or polymerase-proofreading genes. Multiple germline cancer predisposition syndromes in children and young adults, including constitutional mismatch repair deficiency (CMMRD), Lynch, polymerase-proofreading deficiency, and rare digenic syndromes can lead to RRD cancers. The most frequent brain tumors in these children are high-grade gliomas. Embryonal tumors like medulloblastoma have also been described. Lower-grade tumors are reported from cancer surveillance initiatives. The latter has an extremely high rate of malignant transformation. Novel functional assays quantifying the genomic microsatellite indel load have been demonstrated to be highly sensitive and specific for the diagnosis of RRD cancers and children with germline CMMRD. Importantly, RRD brain tumors uniformly harbor high mutation and microsatellite burden. High T-cell infiltration makes these aggressive cancers amenable to immune checkpoint inhibition, irrespective of their germline genetic background. Synergistic combinations are reported to be successful in patients failing checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy. Future directions include the development of innovative approaches to improve immune surveillance for RRD brain cancers. Additionally, the use of novel tools including circulating tumor DNA and quantifying microsatellite indel load over time can be useful to monitor disease burden and treatment responses in patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".