ChatENT: Augmented Large Language Model for Expert Knowledge Retrieval in Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The recent surge in popularity of large language models (LLMs), such as ChatGPT, has showcased their proficiency in medical examinations and potential applications in health care. However, LLMs possess inherent limitations, including inconsistent accuracy, specific prompting requirements, and the risk of generating harmful hallucinations. A domain-specific model might address these limitations effectively. STUDY DESIGN: Developmental design. SETTING: Virtual. METHODS: Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery (OHNS) relevant data were systematically gathered from open-access Internet sources and indexed into a knowledge database. We leveraged Retrieval-Augmented Language Modeling to recall this information and utilized it for pretraining, which was then integrated into ChatGPT4.0, creating an OHNS-specific knowledge question & answer platform known as ChatENT. The model is further tested on different types of questions. RESULTS: ChatENT showed enhanced performance in the analysis and interpretation of OHNS information, outperforming ChatGPT4.0 in both the Canadian Royal College OHNS sample examination questions challenge and the US board practice questions challenge, with a 58.4% and 26.0% error reduction, respectively. ChatENT generated fewer hallucinations and demonstrated greater consistency. CONCLUSION: To the best of our knowledge, ChatENT is the first specialty-specific knowledge retrieval artificial intelligence in the medical field that utilizes the latest LLM. It appears to have considerable promise in areas such as medical education, patient education, and clinical decision support. The model has demonstrated the capacity to overcome the limitations of existing LLMs, thereby signaling a future of more precise, safe, and user-friendly applications in the realm of OHNS and other medical fields.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".