EnKSGD: A Class of Preconditioned Black Box Optimization and Inversion Algorithms
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract. In this paper, we introduce the ensemble Kalman–Stein gradient descent (EnKSGD) class of algorithms. The EnKSGD class of algorithms builds on the ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF) line of work, applying techniques from sequential data assimilation to unconstrained optimization and parameter estimation problems. An essential idea is to exploit the EnKF as a black box (i.e., derivative-free, zeroth order) optimization tool if iterated to convergence. In this paper, we return to the foundations of the EnKF as a sequential data assimilation technique, including its continuous-time and mean-field limits, with the goal of developing faster optimization algorithms suited to noisy black box optimization and inverse problems. The resulting EnKSGD class of algorithms can be designed to both maintain the desirable property of affine-invariance and employ the well-known backtracking line search. Furthermore, EnKSGD algorithms are designed to not necessitate the subspace restriction property and to avoid the variance collapse property of previous iterated EnKF approaches to optimization, as both these properties can be undesirable in an optimization context. EnKSGD also generalizes beyond the [Formula: see text] loss and is thus applicable to a wider class of problems than the standard EnKF. Numerical experiments with empirical risk minimization type problems, including both linear and nonlinear least squares problems, as well as maximum likelihood estimation, demonstrate the faster empirical convergence of EnKSGD relative to alternative EnKF approaches to optimization. Reproducibility of computational results. This paper has been awarded the “SIAM Reproducibility Badge: Code and Data Available” as a recognition that the authors have followed reproducibility principles valued by SISC and the scientific computing community. Code and data that allow readers to reproduce the results in this paper are available at https://github.com/0x4249/EnKSGD and in the supplementary material ( M156114_Supplementary_Materials.zip [106KB]). [Formula: see text]
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".