Menggali Potensi Tanaman Herbal Sebagai Alternatif Pengobatan Hipertensi
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This activity (PKM) aims to provide education to the community regarding herbal medicine for hypertension at Posyandu Anggrek 4 Sukamandi Village which was held on 26 August 2023. This activity is one of the prevention efforts related to hypertension which is increasing in rural areas. The participants of this PKM are the people of Dusun 4 Sukamandi Village, totaling 30 people. This activity was carried out offline by using lecture, question and answer and student demonstration methods related to how to make alternative herbal drinks for the prevention of hypertension. Herbal plants used as an alternative treatment for hypertension are pandan leaves and celery. For plant processing, it is done by boiling the plant with a time of around 3-5 minutes. This activity aims to provide education about the prevention of hypertension in the community, with this counselling activity there is a significant increase in community knowledge with an average score of 42.00 suggestions for this activity are the involvement of other partners as supporters still need to be improved. In addition, the time for implementing activities needs to be increased so that the objectives of the activity can be fully achieved.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.034 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".