MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399816940 · doi:10.1080/10407782.2024.2366445

Modeling of artificial neural network to analyze heat and mass transfer of ternary hybrid nanofluid between two parallel plates with inclined magnetic field

2024· article· en· W4399816940 on OpenAlexaff
Reshu Gupta

Bibliographic record

VenueNumerical Heat Transfer Part A Applications · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNanofluid Flow and Heat Transfer
Canadian institutionsInnovation Cluster (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNanofluidTernary operationArtificial neural networkMass transferHeat transferMagnetic fieldMaterials scienceMechanicsComputer sciencePhysicsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The applications of the artificial neural network (ANN) have become the focus of interest of researchers due to their convenience for accurate modeling, simulation, and efficiency of evaluation. The primary objective of this study is to investigate the characteristics of heat and mass transfer of the ternary hybrid nanofluid flow (THNF), which is squeezed between two parallel plates, using ANN. The plate which lies on x-axis is stretching while the upper plate (UP) can move in upward and downward direction. An inclined magnetic field (MF) is also applied to the lower plate (LP). A system of partial differential equations of flow, energy, and mass transfer is used to simulate the THNF, which is then condensed using similarity substitution to a collection of ordinary differential equations (ODEs). Using the differential transform method (DTM), the resultant nonlinear ODEs in dimensionless form are further solved. The influence of the different varying physical parameters on velocity, temperature, and concentration is graphically presented and discussed. It becomes apparent that the velocity, heat, and mass transfer in squeezing flows are significantly impacted by the inclination angle of the applied MF. To demonstrate the validity of the study, the numerical findings of the Nusselt and the Sherwood numbers are provided. For the accuracy of the used approach, DTM results are compared with results from the numerical approach. The novelty of the current work is to train the neural network with the Levenberg–Marquardt algorithm in the model. To get the estimated output of the model, different scenarios are set for training, testing, and validation. The analysis is done by mean square error (MSE), histogram, fitness curve, and regression (RG). The created ANN model is shown to be reliable due to its exceptional accuracy throughout the training, validation, and testing stages.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNumerical Heat Transfer Part A ApplicationsSame topicNanofluid Flow and Heat TransferFrench-language works237,207