Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’archipel communautaire québécois compte des milliers de groupes locaux fédérés en dizaines de regroupements nationaux et régionaux, dont certains entretiennent des liens internationaux. Il emploie des milliers de personnes, lesquelles encadrent des centaines de milliers de bénévoles, et dispose d’un soutien financier, largement étatique, qui frôle le milliard de dollars. Aussi, la connaissance des groupes qui forment cet archipel, de ce qu’ils sont et de ce qu’ils furent, est essentielle à la compréhension de notre société et des tensions qui l’ont marquée au cours du dernier demi-siècle. Cet essai d’Henri Lamoureux, un militant actif de divers mouvements sociaux, présente leur évolution, tant au plan organisationnel qu’en termes éthiques et politiques. Celles et ceux qui œuvrent actuellement dans le milieu communautaire y découvriront les essentiels repères historiques et éthiques qui leur permettront d’évaluer si leurs pratiques sont toujours en phase avec ce qui leur a donné naissance. La lecture de ce livre leur rappellera de se penser non comme des gestionnaires de la misère humaine, mais comme des vecteurs de changement constant et des militants du progrès humain.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.015 | 0.022 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.009 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".