Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’ Éthique et culture religieuse , un tournant majeur en éducation au Québec ? Assurément. Un défi à relever ? Forcément. Un processus inachevé ? Inévitablement. Les réflexions critiques et prospectives présentées dans cet ouvrage soulèvent des questions éthiques, philosophiques et pédagogiques tout en proposant différentes pistes qui, nous l’espérons, contribueront à l’évolution de ce programme, à sa mise en œuvre ainsi qu’au débat social et politique qu’il suscite. Les textes regroupés dans ce livre se présentent comme suit: Une éthique enrichie – modèles de la vie bonne et questions existentielles; Une posture professionnelle à exercer et développer – dialogue philosophique et objectivation de la pratique; Un enseignement en contexte – éducation à la consommation éthique, émergence d’une véritable citoyenneté et approche implicite pour la réussite des élèves; La cohérence du programme – fondements reconstructifs et débat social et politique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.016 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".