L'information: la nécessaire perspective citoyenne
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sensationnalisme, manque d’équilibre, absence de mise en contexte, uniformisation de l’information, sous-représentation des régions : la situation de l’information au Québec est préoccupante. La conclusion des auteurs à ce sujet est claire et sans acrimonie : la perspective des entreprises médiatiques ne se concilie tout simplement pas avec le regard citoyen. Rejetant de plus en plus toute forme d’autoréglementation, ces entreprises semblent vouloir revenir à un capitalisme sans contraintes, abandonnant leur mission sociale d’expression démocratique pour devenir de simples instruments de profits. Cet essai met de l’avant une nouvelle manière d’aborder l’information, soit selon une perspective citoyenne. On y revoit les grandes constituantes de l’information afin de mieux saisir son importance pour la démocratie. Cette réflexion ne se limite pas qu’aux simples constats : on y retrouve une synthèse des solutions proposées par tous les plus grands exercices de consultations publiques qui se sont penchées sur l’information. Conclusion surprenante, les solutions sont déjà en place. Il existe un observatoire sur la culture et les communications, des ordres professionnels, des tribunaux administratifs… Il ne s’agit que de les convoquer !
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.035 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.026 | 0.023 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.010 | 0.010 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".