Bibliographic record
Abstract
Alors que le monde entier découvre ou redécouvre la microfinance en 2006 avec la remise du prix Nobel de la paix au Bengladais Muhammad Yunus, promoteur du microcrédit, la réussite d’une organisation québécoise de type coopératif sur ce plan reste encore méconnue au Québec : celle de Développement international Desjardins (DID). S’intéressant à la stratégie de communication organisationnelle de cette composante du Mouvement Desjardins, l’auteure retrace les moments majeurs de son histoire et les associe aux grandes étapes de l’évolution de ses communications. Porté à la fois par des valeurs entrepreneuriales (rendement, performance, intégrité, transparence) et associatives (solidarité, égalité, démocratie participative, autonomie) et s’appuyant sur une variété de canaux (assemblée, réunion, journaux interne et externe, communiqué, brochure, rapport, vidéo, site Internet et intranet), le projet de communication de DID est complexe. Tenant compte d’objectifs multiples, telle la mise en évidence de l’organisation auprès du Mouvement Desjardins, il se révèle un sujet d’étude fascinant et formateur.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".