Photoinduced Luminescence Enhancement of Hydrophilic 'Caged' Carbons Dots
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<p>Over the last decade, carbon dots (CDs) have quickly emerged as outstanding 'green' nanoprobes for fluorescence imaging and microscopy techniques. In this context, the identification of a mechanism to tune the CD's optical properties (e.g., fluorescence) can translate into the development of photoactivatable probes with improved performance for super-resolution bioimaging. In relation to this, facile synthetic protocol was devised to photoactivate the luminescence of two types of hydrophilic carbon dots (-COOH and -N doped carbon dots) by 'caging' the nanostructures with photocleavable 2-nitrobenzyl groups. It was demonstrated that 2nitrobenzyl groups efficiently quench the emission intensity of both resulting nanoconstructs. Nonetheless, the luminescence of the 'caged' carbon dots can be partially recovered, upon ultraviolet illumination, in solution.</p>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".