MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399828328 · doi:10.32920/26052718.v1

A Concurrent CNN-RNN Approach for Multi-step Wind Power Forecasting

2024· preprint· en· W4399828328 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Syed Kazmi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnergy Load and Power Forecasting
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of Toronto
KeywordsRecurrent neural networkComputer scienceWind powerPower (physics)Artificial intelligenceArtificial neural networkElectrical engineeringEngineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<p>Wind power forecasting helps with the planning for the power systems by contributing to having a higher level of certainty in decision-making. Due to the randomness inherent to meteorological events (e.g., wind speeds), making highly accurate long-term predictions can be extremely difficult. One approach to remedy this challenge is to utilize weather information from multiple points across a geographical grid to obtain a holistic view of the wind patterns, along with temporal information from the previous power outputs of the wind farms. My proposed CNN-RNN architecture combines convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and recurrent neural networks (RNNs) to extract spatial and temporal contexts from multi-dimensional input data in order to make day-ahead predictions. Compared to other methods in the relevant literature, my method incorporates an ultra-wide learning view, combining data from multiple numerical weather prediction models, wind farms, and geographical locations. Specifically, I use a memory-efficient approach where CNN is utilized only for spatial feature extraction, while temporal attributes are diverted towards RNN. This allows me to maximize our spatial layout. Additionally, I experiment with global forecasting approaches to understand the impact of training the same model over the datasets obtained from multiple different wind farms, and I employ a method where spatial information extracted from convolutional layers is passed to a tree ensemble (e.g., Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LGBM)) instead of fully connected layers. Lastly, I consider multitask learning techniques to train a machine learning model to forecast wind power output and classify ramp events simultaneously. The results show that my proposed CNN-RNN architecture outperforms other machine learning models such as LGBM, Extra Tree regressor and linear regression when trained globally, but fails to replicate such performance when trained individually on each farm. I note that the small training size and the lack of high-quality data for such a complex neural network could be a major contributing factor to the lower performance of the CNN-RNN model trained over individual wind farm data. I also observe that passing the spatial information from CNN to LGBM improves its performance, providing further evidence of CNN’s spatial feature extraction capabilities. My results for multitask learning show a slight drop in average forecasting performance, and a slight improvement in average classification performance, however, these changes are not found to be statistically significant.</p>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.835
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.076
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEnergy Load and Power ForecastingFrench-language works237,207