MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4399828708 · doi:10.32920/26052553

It's What Makes a House a Homo: Queer and Trans Residential Geographies of Toronto, How Identity and Kinship Influences Inhabitation of Space and Place

2024· preprint· en· W4399828708 on OpenAlexaffabout
Sam Casola

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicLGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan UniversityLaurentian University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKinshipQueerIdentity (music)Space (punctuation)SociologyGenealogyGender studiesGeographyAnthropologyAestheticsArtHistoryLinguisticsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Since the inception of Toronto's Church-Wellesley Village, mainstream discourse has classified the neighbourhood as the center of LGBT life in Toronto, grouping and defining LGBTQ2S+ histories and lives into one assumed universal experience (Idlewild, 2016; Nash, 2005; Ghazhani, 2014). Yet, The Village was established on a basis of homonormativity, which created an enclave for primarily white, middle-class, cisgender, gay men (Idlewild, 2016; Nash, 2005). The resulting marginalization of LGBTQIA2S+ individuals who did not conform to constructed norms of sexuality or gender led to their relocation beyond The Village (Nash, 2013; Bitterman & Hess, 2020). This research project explores the locations beyond The Church-Wellesley Village in which LGBTQIA2S+ individuals inhabit, including the neighbourhoods in which they reside, the housing typologies in which they live, and the ways in which identity and kinship influences inhabitation of space and place. A historic exploration of LGBTQIA2S+ dwellings and lives across the City is conducted, and a map of findings is produced. Primary data representing the current landscape is then collected, coded and utilized in forming socio-spatial maps of LGBTQIA2S+ households across Toronto and respective information related to geographic location, dwelling type, identity and kinship. Analysis of the maps is completed through a comparative approach to identify location-based themes and patterns. The project provides a deeper understanding of LGBTQIA2S+ community in Toronto by highlighting the communities' spacial experiences and living needs beyond the basis of cisgender, white, gay men. As individuals of all ages, ethnicities, genders and sexualities reside across the City, intersecting identities, kinship structures and spatial geographies of LGBTQIA2S+ individuals must be considered in order to understand and accommodate the range of lifestyles and households within the LGBTQIA2S+ community.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.074
Threshold uncertainty score0.150

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0130.006
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.356
Teacher spread0.323 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicLGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy→French-language works237,207→