MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Revitalization of Mining Heritage Town

2022· article· en· W4399834295 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mark Yan Wong, Jing Zhou

Bibliographic record

Venue博物院. · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicCultural Heritage Management and Preservation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArchaeologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ghost town is a unique phenomenon in North American history and society. Barkerville Historic Town and Park, a known ghost town in Northern Canada, once flourished because of a rapid gold mining industry. It significantly increased and then decreased in population accordingly with the availability of its gold resource. However, this history makes it an important location carrying a rich Canadian national cultural character for both historic memory research and archeological excavation. To increase its regional economy and revitalize cultural resources, the Canadian federal, provincial, and regional/municipal governments created Barkerville Historic Town and Park with a unique interactive character. It highlights a human-environment interactive experience based on the local infrastructure, history and memory, to form a nostalgia of the North. Visitors can learn about Canadian ideas, nationhood, history and culture through the medium of an interactive cultural tourism experience that promotes buying and selling of local product brands, thus establishing a new kind of industrial ecology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.177
Threshold uncertainty score0.353

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0140.007
Scholarly communication0.0070.002
Open science0.0020.009
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.111
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.120 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue博物院.Same topicCultural Heritage Management and PreservationFrench-language works237,207