MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399842148 · doi:10.1117/12.3015073

Enhanced near-infrared plasmonic sensing chips with ultra-thin optical absorption nanolayer fabricated by cross-beam pulsed laser deposition (CB-PLD)

2024· article· en· W4399842148 on OpenAlexaff
Nurzad Zakirov, Shaodi Zhu, Amine Zitouni, Zahra Shayegan, Étienne Charette, Boris Le Drogoff, Mohamed Chaker, Shuwen Zeng

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicAnalytical Chemistry and Sensors
Canadian institutionsUniversité du QuébecInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceBiosensorOptoelectronicsPlasmonSurface plasmon resonanceRefractive indexThin filmPulsed laser depositionSurface plasmonLaserNanotechnologyOpticsNanoparticle

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Plasmonic biosensing is an optical technique that based on refractive index change when the target molecules interact with the sensing surface. Main plasmonic material used in this type of biosensors is gold. Our work is dedicated to design a novel sensing SPR chip with vanadium dioxide (VO2) nanolayer, known for its unique insulator-to-metal phase transition in the near-infrared region. VO2 thin film is deposited using Cross-Beam Pulsed Laser Deposition (CB-PLD) method and gold layer deposition is performed by sputtering. By employing the VO2 nanolayer, we create a highly responsive biosensing interface (with a much-improved sensitivity and also a wide dynamic measurement range). The VO2 layer's ability to modulate the refractive index enables precise control of the excited plasmon resonance. This interaction results in enhancing sensitivity and the capability to detect low-concentration analytes with high accuracy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAnalytical Chemistry and SensorsFrench-language works237,207