International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology CXIV: Orexin Receptor Function, Nomenclature and Pharmacology
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Orexin receptors are capable of coupling to all four families of heterotrimeric G proteins, and there are also other complex features of the orexin receptor signaling. The system was discovered 25 years ago and was immediately identified as a central regulator of sleep and wakefulness; this is exemplified by the symptomatology of the disorder narcolepsy with cataplexy, in which orexinergic neurons degenerate. Subsequent translation of these findings into drug discovery and development has resulted to date in three clinically used orexin receptor antagonists to treat insomnia. In addition to sleep and wakefulness, the orexin system appears to be a central player at least in addiction and reward, and has a role in depression, anxiety and pain gating. Additional antagonists and agonists are in development to treat, for instance, insomnia, narcolepsy with or without cataplexy and other disorders with excessive daytime sleepiness, depression with insomnia, anxiety, schizophrenia, as well as eating and substance use disorders. The orexin system has thus proved an important regulator of numerous neural functions and a valuable drug target. Orexin prepro-peptide and orexin receptors are also expressed outside the central nervous system, but their potential physiological roles there remain unknown. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: The orexin system was discovered 25 years ago and immediately emerged as an essential sleep-wakefulness regulator. This discovery has tremendously increased the understanding of these processes and has thus far resulted in the market approval of three orexin receptor antagonists, which promote more physiological aspects of sleep than previous hypnotics. Further, orexin receptor agonists and antagonists with different pharmacodynamic properties are in development since research has revealed additional potential therapeutic indications. Orexin receptor signaling is complex and may represent novel features.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".