MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399847977 · doi:10.1117/12.3020640

Demonstrating complex visibility measurements and image reconstruction using a double-Fourier interferometer testbed

2024· article· en· W4399847977 on OpenAlexaff
Jeremy P. Scott, Locke D. Spencer, Chris S. Benson

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicOptical measurement and interference techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Lethbridge
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTestbedVisibilityInterferometryComputer scienceFourier transformIterative reconstructionOpticsComputer visionRemote sensingArtificial intelligencePhysicsGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Far-Infrared (FIR; 25−350μm) band remains relatively unexplored in astronomy despite its importance for studying the formation and evolution of planets, stars, and galaxies. One factor which limits FIR observing capabilities is the impractically large single aperture telescopes that would be required to achieve the sub-arcsecond angular resolution that has been obtained in the optical and radio bands. A Double-Fourier Interferometer (DFI) has been proposed, which combines both a spatial interferometer and a Fourier Transform Spectrometer (FTS). Such an instrument, however, is lacking in experimental validation. This work contributes to DFI development by demonstrating the technique for a simple, spectrally uniform source.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.720
Threshold uncertainty score0.903

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.195
GPT teacher head0.351
Teacher spread0.156 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOptical measurement and interference techniquesFrench-language works237,207