MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399848902 · doi:10.4000/11v7y

Rinceaux et protofiligranes : la tige végétale dans l’enluminure de l’an mil dans les scriptoria d’Europe du Nord

2024· article· fr· W4399848902 on OpenAlexaff
Rémy Cordonnier

Bibliographic record

VenueLa Revue de la BNU · 2024
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDeath, Funerary Practices, and Mourning
Canadian institutionsBibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le végétal semble omniprésent dans l’enluminure médiévale que l’on associe couramment aux rinceaux feuillus et aux feuilles d’acanthe multicolores. Cependant, cette impression n’est vraie qu’en partie. En effet, les motifs végétaux ne deviennent réellement abondants dans le décor des livres qu’à partir de la fin du haut Moyen-Âge (seconde moitié du 9e siècle). Ils sont plutôt rares dans les arts paléochrétiens, barbares et de la première époque carolingienne. Quand une plante ou un arbre son...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.966
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLa Revue de la BNUSame topicDeath, Funerary Practices, and MourningFrench-language works237,207