MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399849444 · doi:10.1109/lcsys.2024.3417172

An Observer-Based Extremum Seeking Controller Design for a Class of Second-Order Nonlinear Systems

2024· article· en· W4399849444 on OpenAlexaff
Seyed Mohammad Moein Mousavi, Martin Guay

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Control Systems Letters · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicExtremum Seeking Control Systems
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Nonlinear systemClass (philosophy)Observer (physics)Order (exchange)Controller (irrigation)Computer scienceControl engineeringMathematicsEngineeringControl (management)Artificial intelligencePhysicsEconomicsBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this letter, an extremum seeking controller (ESC) is designed for stabilization and output minimization for a class of second-order control-affine nonlinear systems. The main difficulty with such design lays in the fact that the relative degree between the measured output and the system’s input is two. As a result, the classical ESC approaches which use a high-pass filter for differentiation, are not suitable. We propose a perturbation-based controller in the feedback loop that utilizes a high-gain like observer with bounded derivatives of first and second-order. The closed-loop system is shown to be practically stable while maintaining the output in a small neighborhood of its optimum value. Simulation results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Control Systems LettersSame topicExtremum Seeking Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207