MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399849824 · doi:10.1109/ojpel.2024.3417017

Modulation Improvements for High-Phase-Count Series-Capacitor Buck Converters

2024· article· en· W4399849824 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Open Journal of Power Electronics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced DC-DC Converters
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConvertersCapacitorBuck converterSeries (stratigraphy)Modulation (music)Phase (matter)Electronic engineeringThree-phaseControl theory (sociology)Computer scienceElectrical engineeringPhysicsEngineeringVoltageAcousticsArtificial intelligenceGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article presents three modulation improvements for the series-capacitor buck (SCB) converter and its topological derivatives. The first consists of various phase activation sequences (PHACTSs) which raise the maximum input-to-output voltage conversion ratio of an <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">N</i>-inductor, <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">N</i>-phase SCB converter beyond the traditional limit of 1/<italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">N</i><sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup>, without incurring any additional voltage stress to the switches. Phase counts up to 16 are analyzed with conversion ratios increasing by a factor of up to 7. Due to the inherent link between the converter's maximum attainable output voltage and maximum output current slew rate, these PHACTSs offer a significant improvement to the load-voltage transient response. Utilizing the flying capacitors that link adjacent inductors, a second modulation technique is introduced that effectively increases the digital pulse-width-modulator's (DPWM) output-voltage resolution, by a factor of <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">N</i>, by employing a novel method of minimum duty increments (MDIs). Despite the commonly-held assumption of automatic steady-state inductor-current-balancing present in an <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">N</i>-inductor SCB, large-signal modelling reveals that slight current imbalances inevitably arise, even in lossless configurations, with three or more output inductors. After elucidating its origin, this article introduces a third modulation technique that can reduce these inductor current imbalances through a particular implementation of MDI. A discrete prototype of an 11-inductor, 48 V-to-1.0 V, 275 A-load, SCB converter was fabricated to experimentally demonstrate and validate the simulated results of the increase in both the output voltage ceiling and DPWM resolution, as well as to evaluate the MDI-DPWM output-voltage linearity. Finally, the maintenance of both inductor current balancing and low switch-voltage-stress is experimentally substantiated when using MDI.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.903
Threshold uncertainty score0.903

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it