Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The chapter considers how the perspective of deification colors people’s relationship with the material world: the Orthodox monastic tradition, intensely focused on deification, also affords outstanding contemporary examples of ecological living. The Greek patristic tradition establishes the “greater arc” of creation for deification, God’s presence in creation through the logoi of beings (St. Maximus), and matter deified through God’s incarnate presence. The ascetic emphasis on bodily transformation extends transfiguration through the material world. The legacy of Russian religious philosophy is a cosmic vision, but also the idea of deification as human task. Themes of “humanizing” and technological mastery in Bulgakov, Teilhard de Chardin, and, later, Stăniloae are contentious; but they and others, notably Clément, also highlight the progressive transfiguration of the material world through the church and especially the Eucharist. Deification is thus a reality already glimpsed—dependent however not on humans nor on pristine nature, but on God alone.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".