MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399854348 · doi:10.1001/jama.2024.8599

A Clinical Diagnostic Test for Calcium Release Deficiency Syndrome

2024· letter· en· W4399854348 on OpenAlexafffund
Mingke Ni, Ziv Dadon, Julian O.M. Ormerod, Johan Saenen, Wiert F. Hoeksema, Pavel Antiperovitch, Rafik Tadros, Morten Krogh Christiansen, Christian Steinberg, Marine Arnaud, Shanshan Tian, Bo Sun, John Paul Estillore, Ruiwu Wang, Habib Khan, Thomas M. Roston, Andrea Mazzanti, John Giudicessi, Konstantinos C. Siontis, Aiman Alak, J. Gabriel Acosta, Syamkumar M. Divakara Menon, Nigel S. Tan, Christian van der Werf, Babak Nazer, Hari Vivekanantham, Tanvi Pandya, Jennifer Cunningham, Lorne J. Gula, Jorge Wong, Guy Amit, Melvin M. Scheinman, Andrew D. Krahn, Michael J. Ackerman, Silvia G. Priori, Michael H. Gollob, Jeff S. Healey, Frédéric Sacher, Eyal Nof, Michael Glikson, Arthur A.M. Wilde, Hugh Watkins, Henrik Kjærulf Jensen, Pieter G. Postema, Bernard Belhassen, S.R. Wayne Chen, Jason D. Roberts

Bibliographic record

VenueJAMA · 2024
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Canadian institutionsMontreal Heart InstituteUniversity of British ColumbiaInstitut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de QuébecPopulation Health Research InstituteUniversité LavalUniversité de MontréalUniversity of TorontoWestern UniversityToronto General HospitalMcMaster UniversityHamilton Health SciencesLibin Cardiovascular Institute of AlbertaUniversity of Calgary
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsMedicineCalciumTest (biology)Internal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Importance: Sudden death and cardiac arrest frequently occur without explanation, even after a thorough clinical evaluation. Calcium release deficiency syndrome (CRDS), a life-threatening genetic arrhythmia syndrome, is undetectable with standard testing and leads to unexplained cardiac arrest. Objective: To explore the cardiac repolarization response on an electrocardiogram after brief tachycardia and a pause as a clinical diagnostic test for CRDS. Design, Setting, and Participants: An international, multicenter, case-control study including individual cases of CRDS, 3 patient control groups (individuals with suspected supraventricular tachycardia; survivors of unexplained cardiac arrest [UCA]; and individuals with genotype-positive catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia [CPVT]), and genetic mouse models (CRDS, wild type, and CPVT were used to define the cellular mechanism) conducted at 10 centers in 7 countries. Patient tracings were recorded between June 2005 and December 2023, and the analyses were performed from April 2023 to December 2023. Intervention: Brief tachycardia and a subsequent pause (either spontaneous or mediated through cardiac pacing). Main Outcomes and Measures: Change in QT interval and change in T-wave amplitude (defined as the difference between their absolute values on the postpause sinus beat and the last beat prior to tachycardia). Results: Among 10 case patients with CRDS, 45 control patients with suspected supraventricular tachycardia, 10 control patients who experienced UCA, and 3 control patients with genotype-positive CPVT, the median change in T-wave amplitude on the postpause sinus beat (after brief ventricular tachycardia at ≥150 beats/min) was higher in patients with CRDS (P < .001). The smallest change in T-wave amplitude was 0.250 mV for a CRDS case patient compared with the largest change in T-wave amplitude of 0.160 mV for a control patient, indicating 100% discrimination. Although the median change in QT interval was longer in CRDS cases (P = .002), an overlap between the cases and controls was present. The genetic mouse models recapitulated the findings observed in humans and suggested the repolarization response was secondary to a pathologically large systolic release of calcium from the sarcoplasmic reticulum. Conclusions and Relevance: There is a unique repolarization response on an electrocardiogram after provocation with brief tachycardia and a subsequent pause in CRDS cases and mouse models, which is absent from the controls. If these findings are confirmed in larger studies, this easy to perform maneuver may serve as an effective clinical diagnostic test for CRDS and become an important part of the evaluation of cardiac arrest.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.065
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJAMASame topicCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmiasFrench-language works237,207