MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399855456 · doi:10.4103/jsip.jsip_abstract_97

Ab. No. 167 Association between Balance, Cognition and Quality of Life in Middle Aged Postmenopausal Women: A Cross Sectional Study

2024· article· en· W4399855456 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Himani Suthar, Payal Gahlot

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Society of Indian Physiotherapists · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealth and Wellbeing Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCross-sectional studyCognitionAssociation (psychology)Balance (ability)MedicineGerontologyQuality of life (healthcare)Postmenopausal womenPsychologyDemographyPhysical therapyInternal medicinePsychiatryPathologySociologyPsychotherapist

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: The hormonal changes occurring in women during and after menopause transition have a relevant impact on physical performance and health-related quality of life. The use of challenging balance conditions to detect sub clinical risk of balance impairment has been reported in aging population. Postmenopausal women may experience a decline in cognitive skills in their daily lives. A decrease in functional performance and cognitive function may lead to poor quality of life in postmenopausal women. There are studies reporting that low physical function can predict low cognitive function during menopause. The aim of the study is to find out association between balance, cognition and quality of life of middle-aged postmenopausal women. Methods: Middle aged 102 postmenopausal females aged 40-60years were included for study. A cross sectional study was conducted among 102 postmenopausal women who had natural history of menopause were included. Any women who had hysterectomy, hormonal replacement therapy, any severe musculoskeletal impairment, abnormal hearing and vision were excluded. Data was collected using the menopause specific quality of life questionnaire, timed up and go test for dynamic balance and Montreal cognitive assessment used for level of cognition. Result: Total 102 postmenopausal females aged 49.66±3.46 years. Mean scores for TUG (9.27 + 1.25), MOCA (21.46 + 2.90) and MENQOL (40.37 + 8.34) were seen. Correlation was found between TUG and MOCA were (p=.009) (r=.928), between TUG and MENQOL were (p=.056) (r=.574) and MENQOL with MOCA were(p=-.031) (r=.756) statistically significant. Conclusion: There is positive relationship between balance, cognition and quality of life is seen in middle aged postmenopausal females. Implications: Assessing and intervening early in the functional performance is essential to maintain and preserve cognitive function in aging by tailored cognitive motor training with holistic approach to maintain quality of life.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.446
Teacher spread0.384 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Society of Indian PhysiotherapistsSame topicHealth and Wellbeing ResearchFrench-language works237,207