MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399858491 · doi:10.1016/j.istruc.2024.106744

Enhancing energy dissipation in glued-laminated timber assemblies using boundary connections

2024· article· en· W4399858491 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueStructures · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWood Treatment and Properties
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDissipationStructural engineeringBoundary (topology)Energy (signal processing)Materials scienceComputer scienceEngineeringPhysicsMathematicsMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mass-timber assemblies rely on connections and proper yielding hierarchy to provide energy-dissipation and ductility under extreme dynamic loading events. Steel Energy-Absorbing Connections (EAC) have been shown to provide significant energy dissipation when subjected to blast loads . However, whether full-scale behaviour can be estimated entirely based on known performance of individual EAC and glulam beam information, determined from component testing or design provisions, is still unclear. To address this gap in the current knowledge, EACs were tested at the connection-level, and the results were used to investigate a total of eleven full-scale glulam beam specimens , with various EACs as boundary connections. The results of the full-scale testing showed that a proper hierarchy of failure was achieved, where the EACs yielded and deformed completely prior to attaining ultimate failure in the glued-laminated beam, allowing for significant energy-dissipation in the connections and improved ductility. An equivalent composite system-level load-displacement curve based on the behaviour of the EACs and glulam beam in isolation was proposed. The findings indicated that simple analytical techniques can be used to obtain the full-scale behaviour based on information of the EAC and glulam beam in isolation. Analytical methods such as single-degree-of-freedom (SDOF) and two degree-of-freedom (TDOF) analysis in which the dynamic behaviour of the system under blast loading was predicted were validated against experimental results, and the same techniques were used to investigate the potential contribution of the EACs in terms of additional energy dissipation relative to the glulam beam alone. It was found that the EAC-glulam systems achieved, on average, 570 % more energy-dissipation relative to the case where the beam was assumed to be simply supported.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.073
Threshold uncertainty score0.391

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it