MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399859952 · doi:10.58931/cect.2024.3241

Review of Nutritional Supplementation Options for the Anterior Segment: An Evidence Based Approach

2024· article· en· W4399859952 on OpenAlexaff
Allan R. Slomovic, Manokamna Agarwal

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Eye Care Today · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSkin Protection and Aging
Canadian institutionsToronto Western HospitalUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The anterior segment of the eye is a metabolically active system, which includes the ocular surface of the eye and extends posteriorly to the crystalline lens. Ocular surface diseases often disrupt the complex interplay of cornea, conjunctiva, meibomian glands, eyelids, and the lacrimal system, leading to diminished visual acuity and discomfort, and occasionally to frank pain. This can negatively impact the patient’s quality of life. Other anterior segment diseases including keratoconus, glaucoma, and cataract may also affect visual acuity. Oxidative stress and inflammation have been investigated in pathogenesis of these diseases. There has been an increase in the number of studies investigating various nutritional supplements benefiting the anterior segment structures. This review discusses the role of these supplements with supported clinical evidence.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.963
Threshold uncertainty score0.659

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Eye Care TodaySame topicSkin Protection and AgingFrench-language works237,207