Research on Fresh Food E-Commerce Modes in China and Their Development Prospects in the United States and Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the past two decades, the Internet has profoundly affected China's economic development and promoted the transformation of many industries into e-commerce. The fresh market, which is closely related to 1.4 billion people, has also displayed a variety of retail methods that are different from traditional offline shopping under the promotion of the Internet. This huge consumption market has prompted practitioners in the fresh industry to constantly make innovative attempts and changes in the company's operation and supply chain management, eventually giving birth to several new fresh food e-commerce modes. Based on the background of China's population and city scales, this research compares the differences in the early investment, project operation, and supply chain structure of different modes, analyzes the specific scenarios applicable to each mode and the impact of the COVID-19, and explains the development direction of China's fresh food e-commerce business market in the post-epidemic era. Meanwhile, the United States and Canada have vast fresh consumption markets, and the high internet penetration rate guarantees the development of e-commerce. Combined with the market environment and the shopping habits of consumers in the United States and Canada, this research explores the development prospects of fresh food e-commerce modes with Chinese characteristics in these two countries and puts forward the improvements needed to adapt to the market.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.012 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".