MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399878363 · doi:10.1139/as-2024-0001

Terrestrial site fidelity of maternal polar bears in western Hudson Bay

2024· article· en· W4399878363 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Natasha J. Klappstein, David McGeachy, Nicholas W. Pilfold, Nicholas J. Lunn, Andrew E. Derocher

Bibliographic record

VenueArctic Science · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMarine animal studies overview
Canadian institutionsEnvironment and Climate Change CanadaUniversity of AlbertaDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBayFidelityGeographyUrsus maritimusPolarOceanographyEnvironmental scienceGeologyArchaeologyArcticTelecommunicationsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Seasonal migrations allow access to temporally varying resources and individuals may show fidelity to specific locations, particularly for important life processes such as reproduction. Polar bears ( Ursus maritimus) are a sea ice-dependent species that migrate between marine and terrestrial habitats, the latter being important for parturition and early cub rearing. However, fidelity to maternity dens is poorly understood. Using capture and telemetry data collected between 1979 and 2018, we assessed site fidelity of female polar bears in the Western Hudson Bay subpopulation in Manitoba, Canada. We compared within-individual inter-year distances between dens to between-individual distances via non-parametric bootstrapping, and used generalized additive models to assess how maternal age, years between denning events, and sea ice conditions affected fidelity. Within-individual distances were smaller than between-individual distances by approximately 18.7 km, indicating some evidence of fidelity. Inter-den distances increased with time between denning events, but no other variables significantly affected fidelity. Our findings suggest that western Hudson Bay polar bears may exhibit fidelity to areas within the larger denning region, but not to specific dens. Understanding the site fidelity of maternal polar bears has important implications for population dynamics, on-land spatial distributions, and conservation efforts aimed at preserving important habitat for reproduction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.774
Threshold uncertainty score0.449

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArctic ScienceSame topicMarine animal studies overviewFrench-language works237,207