MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399878387 · doi:10.1139/as-2023-0053

Surface primary producer phenology in Dease Strait, NU, Canada, examined using submersed oceanographic sensors and satellite remote sensing

2024· article· en· W4399878387 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
Kiran Yendamuri, Julienne Strœve, Jens K. Ehn, William J. Williams, Vishnu Nandan, Brent Else, Alexander S. Komarov, Christina A. Braybrook, C. J. Mundy

Bibliographic record

VenueArctic Science · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryEnvironment and Climate Change CanadaFisheries and Oceans CanadaUniversity of Manitoba
FundersFisheries and Oceans CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Space AgencyCanada Foundation for InnovationArcticNetMarine Environmental Observation Prediction and Response NetworkPolar Knowledge CanadaUniversity of Calgary
KeywordsBloomEnvironmental scienceOceanographyAlgal bloomSea iceArcticPhenologyPhytoplanktonSnowSpring bloomSea surface temperatureIrradianceClimatologyGeologyNutrientEcologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Thinning sea ice cover and earlier melt in the Arctic impact primary producer (PP) phenology, causing earlier ice algal bloom termination and phytoplankton bloom commencement. However, logistic constraints limit capturing the complete seasonal evolution of PPs and their physical drivers. Here, we combine spectral irradiance data from subsurface oceanographic moorings with synthetic aperture radar backscatter and meteorological variables to study light in Dease Strait, investigating its relation to timing and magnitude of surface PPs for 2017 and 2019. Ice algal blooms in 2017 and 2019 lasted 66 and 84 days, respectively, peaking within 2 days of snow melt onset. In 2019, lower temperatures and a deeper snowpack before snow melt extended the ice algal bloom. Melt pond formation increased light transmission, enabling a short, 6–7-day under-ice phytoplankton bloom in both years that was likely nutrient-limited. The 2019 phytoplankton bloom was less productive, possibly due to the longer ice algal bloom depleting surface nutrients. After ice break-up in 2019, a 31-day late-summer bloom occurred via wind-driven mixing. Our findings suggest that the combined remote sensing technique has novel applicability in other settings, providing insights into the changing state of PP phenology, and the need for long-term Arctic observations to discern regional climate change effects.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.357
Threshold uncertainty score0.739

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArctic ScienceSame topicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamicsFrench-language works237,207