MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399879217 · doi:10.1101/2024.06.20.24309230

segcsvd <sub>WMH</sub> : A convolutional neural network-based tool for quantifying white matter hyperintensities in heterogeneous patient cohorts

2024· preprint· en· W4399879217 on OpenAlexaff
Erin Gibson, Joel Ramirez, Lauren Abby Woods, Julie Ottoy, Stephanie Berberian, Christopher J.M. Scott, Vanessa Yhap, Fuqiang Gao, Roberto Duarte Coello, María Valdés Hernández, Anthony E. Lang, Carmela M. Tartaglia, Sanjeev Kumar, Malcolm A. Binns, Robert Bartha, Sean Symons, Richard H. Swartz, Mario Masellis, Navneet Singh, Alan R. Moody, Bradley J. MacIntosh, Joanna M. Wardlaw, Sandra E. Black, Andrew Lim, Maged Goubran

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicBrain Tumor Detection and Classification
Canadian institutionsSunnybrook Health Science CentreWestern UniversityCentre for Addiction and Mental HealthUniversity of TorontoSunnybrook Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHyperintensityConvolutional neural networkWhite matterComputer scienceArtificial intelligencePattern recognition (psychology)MedicineMagnetic resonance imagingRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract White matter hyperintensities (WMH) of presumed vascular origin are an MRI-based biomarker of cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD). WMH are associated with accelerated cognitive decline and increased risk of stroke and dementia, and are commonly observed in aging, vascular cognitive impairment, Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease, and related dementias. The accurate, reliable, and rapid measurement of WMH in large-scale multi-site clinical studies with heterogeneous patient populations remains challenging. The diversity of MRI protocols and image characteristics across different studies as well as the diverse nature of WMH, in terms of their highly variable shape, size, distribution, and underlying pathology, adds additional complexity to this task. Here, we present segcsvd WMH , a novel convolutional neural network-based tool for quantifying WMH. segcsvd WMH is specifically designed for accurate and robust performance when applied to diverse clinical patient datasets. Central to the development of this tool is the curation of a large patient dataset (&gt;700 scans) sourced from seven multi-site studies, encompassing a wide range of clinical populations, WMH burden, and imaging parameters. The performance of segcsvd WMH is evaluated against three widely used WMH segmentation tools, where we demonstrate significantly enhanced accuracy and robustness across a range of challenging conditions and datasets.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.242
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxivSame topicBrain Tumor Detection and ClassificationFrench-language works237,207