Assessment of Cardiovascular Disease Using Machine Learning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a prominent contributor to global mortality rates.The principal aim of this research is to employ machine learning techniques to anticipate the early actions needed to prevent the disease from progressing.The timely identification of individuals with a heightened risk of developing CVD plays an important role in implementing early interventions to impede disease progression.Machine learning techniques have shown promise in predicting CVD risk.For this paper, we propose a comprehensive CVD prediction model using ML techniques.Our approach utilizes a substantial dataset of electronic health records (EHRs) for training and validating our model.Through the incorporation of feature engineering, feature selection, and model optimization techniques, we have reached a high level of accuracy and interpretability.To evaluate the prediction of cardiovascular disease (CVD) threats, we compare the performance of various popular ML algorithms, such as logistic regression, random forest, and Support Vector Machine.Our findings point towards that our proposed model improve on existing approaches in regard of both accuracy and efficiency.This model can efficiently recognize individuals with an elevated risk of developing CVD, enabling early interventions to prevent the onset and progression of the disease.Additionally, we perform a acatalectic analysis of the features that contribute most to the assessment of CVD risk, providing insights into the underlying mechanisms of the disease.We also evaluate the robustness of our model by testing its performance on a separate dataset.Furthermore, we discuss the clinical implications of our proposed model, highlighting the potential benefits of using ML techniques in identifying individuals at high risk of developing CVD.Our model can aid in personalized medicine and facilitate the delivery of targeted interventions to high-risk individuals, thereby improving patient outcomes and reducing healthcare costs.When it comes to treating severe stages of cardiovascular disease, preventive treatments are typically more economical.Our approach can assist in lessening the financial burden related to CVD by lowering hospital stays, ER visits, and long-term care expenses via early detection of high-risk individuals and implementation of focused therapies.In summary, our model presents a robust solution for utilizing machine learning techniques to envisage the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD).Our study targets to provide the expanding field of research regarding the application of machine learning in healthcare.The insights extended from our findings hold significant potential for enhancing the anticipation and treatment of CVD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.013 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".