MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399893928 · doi:10.18280/mmep.110612

Two Phase Heat Transfer on Porous Media Base Termite Nest Structure with Finite Element Method

2024· article· en· W4399893928 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Susilo Hariyanto, Yusephus Decupertino Sumanto, Bibit Waluyo Aji, Nastangini, Sri Nur Chasanah, Aisyah Andria Rahman Raharjo

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematical Modelling and Engineering Problems · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEngineering Applied Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersKementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan TeknologiDirektorat Jenderal Pendidikan TinggiUniversitas Diponegoro
KeywordsFinite element methodPorous mediumBase (topology)Nest (protein structural motif)Heat transferPhase (matter)PorosityMaterials scienceMechanicsGeologyStructural engineeringComposite materialMathematicsPhysicsEngineeringMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Termites have a unique heat regulation where termite nests can maintain a stable temperature even though the temperature outside the nest changes.The termite nest itself has a porous structure that causes the temperature to move with a certain mechanism.The temperature in termite nests is considered to move through two phases, namely the conduction phase and the convection phase.The purpose of this research is to build a thermal insulation model and numerical analysis of thermal insulation models.The thermal insulation model in termite nests is made with a porous media approach.Furthermore, finite element methods are used for simulation and numerical analysis of thermal insulation models in termite nests.Finite element method with Galerkin for element discretization and Runge-Kutta for time discretization.The finite element method simulates thermal distribution in termite nests.The thermal insulation model was validated with original data using MAPE and R 2 Score.The validation results obtained the MAPE score is 3% for the conduction phase and 0.2% for the convection phase.Changes in parameters have a significant effect on conduction but not convection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMathematical Modelling and Engineering ProblemsSame topicEngineering Applied ResearchFrench-language works237,207