MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399895491 · doi:10.18280/ria.380306

The Impact of Oversampling and Undersampling on Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis of Indramayu Tourism Using Logistic Regression

2024· article· en· W4399895491 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Nurul Chamidah, Didit Widiyanto, Henki Bayu Seta, Azwa Abdul Aziz

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue d intelligence artificielle · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicData Mining and Machine Learning Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUndersamplingLogistic regressionOversamplingTourismStatisticsEconometricsMathematicsComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aspect-based sentiment analysis aims to classify sentiment polarity in opinionated texts based on its associated aspect.However, imbalanced data is a significant challenge that can lead to a decline in classification performance.In machine learning, strategies such as oversampling and undersampling can be implemented to rectify this imbalance.The primary objective of this study is to investigate the impact of data balancing techniques, including oversampling and undersampling, on aspect-based sentiment analysis to enhance classification performance.To achieve this objective, SMOTE, random oversampling, and random undersampling are employed in logistic regression for multi-label classification in aspect-based sentiment analysis.The data for this study was obtained from Google Reviews submitted by individuals who visited the beach in Indramayu.Subsequently, this data was annotated based on tourism-related factors and the sentiments expressed by users.Following this, the data underwent a preprocessing stage and was divided into separate training and test datasets.The training dataset accounted for 60% of the data, while the remaining portion was allocated for testing purposes.During the model training process, data balancing was achieved by implementing oversampling and undersampling techniques and utilizing Logistic Regression with Stochastic Gradient Descent Optimization as the model learning method.The resultant model was subsequently employed to test the test dataset.The evaluation results indicate that oversampling techniques led to a considerable improvement in performance compared to the absence of data balancing.These findings provide a comparison between balancing techniques in sentiment analysis models in tourism that suffer from an imbalanced dataset.Consequently, the oversampling technique can be considered in developing aspect-based sentiment analysis models within the tourism industry.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.083
GPT teacher head0.378
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue d intelligence artificielleSame topicData Mining and Machine Learning ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207