The Integration of ANN and FEA and Its Application to Property Prediction of Dual-Performance Turbine Disks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Regulating the microstructure of powder metallurgy (P/M) nickel-based superalloys to achieve superior mechanical properties through heat treatment is a prevalent method in turbine disk design. However, in the case of dual-performance turbine disks, the complexity and non-uniformity of the heat treatment process present substantial challenges. The prediction of yield strength is typically derived from the analysis of microstructures under various heat treatment regimes. This method is time-consuming, expensive, and the accuracy often depends on the precision of microstructural characterization. This study successfully employed a coupled method of Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and finite element analysis (FEA) to reveal the relationship between the heat treatment process and yield strength. The coupled method accurately predicted the location specified and temperature-dependent yield strength based on the heat treatment parameters such as holding temperatures and cooling rates. The root mean square error (RMSE) and mean absolute percentage deviation (MAPD) for the training set are 50.37 and 3.77, respectively, while, for the testing set, they are 50.13 and 3.71, respectively. Furthermore, an integrated model of FEA and ANN is established using a Abaqus user subroutine. The integrated model can predict the yield strength based on temperature calculation results and automatically update material properties of the FEA model during the loading process simulation. This allows for an accurate calculation of the stress-strain state of the turbine disk during actual working conditions, aiding in locating areas of stress concentration, plastic deformation, and other critical regions, and provides a novel reliable reference for the rapid design of the turbine disk.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".